September 26, 2022
Trending Tags

Sonoma County Health Services staff, ordered back to workplace, say they’re being exposed to COVID

Read Time:5 Minute, 35 Second


Union members say taking away the remote work option is no solution.

“I don’t see why it couldn’t continue to work,” said Paul Foster, a Health Services accountant and Local 1021 officer. “We were able to close the fiscal year-end in July 2021. Granted, this last year was rough. But we were able to it.”

As part of Rivera’s directive, employees were given the option of requesting full-time remote work. It simply became another bone of contention. A number of staffers did indeed request through managers to work from home. (Rivera said the number was “10+.”) Every request has been denied, she acknowledged.

“For those exceptions that may be formal requests for accommodation that would have accompanying medical notes, those would have gone to (Health Services’ human resources department) and would follow the County’s standard practices and procedures for medical accommodations,” county spokesperson Matt Brown wrote in an email. “The County could not comment on the status of those that requested medical accommodation because that is protected information.”

Exposure notices mount

Fiscal staff members also were upset at what they perceived as lax COVID protections on Neotomas Avenue, the administrative headquarters for Health Services.

When they first returned, no one was required to wear a mask; that mandate came several days later. There was no added system of social distancing. And the air conditioning unit temporarily stopped circulating on several occasions. At one point, someone opened doors to the patio outside the break room, and propped open two interior doors with floor fans to increase airflow.

“No county facilities were under a mask mandate … however, mask recommendations have always been in place,” Rivera said when asked for comment on those complaints. “Our building filtration systems were analyzed by County risk (managers) and assessed for any additional upgrades required for appropriate air quality standards for smoke and COVID regulations; if any additional equipment was required it was purchased and installed. We also have air scrubbers throughout the building for additional protection.”

Still, the COVID exposure notifications started to arrive within days of the return to in-person work — on May 16, June 2, June 3 and most recently on Wednesday.

As of Thursday, eight Health Services employees at the Neotomas office were out because of coronavirus symptoms or exposure. Those who were known to be in close contact with an infected colleague were told they didn’t have to quarantine, as confirmed in staff notifications shared with The Press Democrat.

Family members at risk

Multiple employees said their circumstances had changed during the pandemic, and it wasn’t easy for them to quickly transition back to on-site work. For some, that had to do with vulnerable relatives.

“When we went back to the office, I stayed with a family member who works with elderly patient as a caretaker, and another member in the household who is immune-compromised with many underlying health conditions,” said one fiscal worker who asked that her name not be used because she fears retaliation. “I did not feel safe when we started to receive notices of exposure.”

For Foster, abandoning remote work had an immediate and tangible effect on his family.

“I’m sitting in the hospital right now because I was called back in the office,” he said Tuesday.

Foster’s father, who turned 84 in May, was living with him during the pandemic. When Health Services employees first returned to the office three days a week, Foster said, he was no longer able to make sure his dad was eating properly and staying safe. His sister in Roseville agreed to take him in.

“But she came to Santa Rosa and was exposed to COVID,” Foster said. “If I didn’t have to work, he would have been home with me.”

Foster’s father was released from the hospital Tuesday.

Morale is low at Neotomas, the workers insist. And so is attendance. On June 2, Joly texted, there were 16 people out in the fiscal department, by her count — about half the staff. On Tuesday she texted to say it was still at least 12 people.

“We have six accountants,” Foster said. “Yesterday, I think I was only one in.”

‘One additional thing’ for businesses

Health Services is far from the only work setting having to make virus-related risk calculations. The county’s epidemiological team is currently investigating 18 reports of possible outbreaks at worksites such as grocery and retail stores, manufacturing sites and wineries, said Brown, the county spokesperson.

While Sonoma County businesses aren’t seeing the dire staffing shortages of the first Omicron wave in early January, shortages do persist, said Peter Rumble, CEO of the Santa Rosa Metro Chamber. That isn’t entirely due to COVID.

“This is like the one additional thing that makes it more challenging,” Rumble said. “It’s like, ‘We can’t fill a handful of positions. And on top of that, the positions I do have, we need to work around time out due to sickness.’”

It all adds up to a difficult calculus for business managers: When is it safe to gather in an office, and which job positions are mostly likely to benefit from face-to-face interaction? Rumble generally favors opening up as much as possible.

“The CDC is telling us this is endemic now,” he said. “And infection today does not mean the same thing as it did in March 2020. If we’re hearing from the highest medical authority, and they’re saying this is endemic, then we need to start living our lives like it’s endemic. That means we need to get our vaccinations and get on with out lives.”

Rivera has framed Health Services return-to-work order as temporary. The assumption is that it will be in effect through July 31, the end of fiscal-year book balancing. After Wednesday’s meeting, Jana Blunt — SEIU Local 1021 president and an employee at the Sonoma County Clerk-Recorder-Assessor-Registrar of Voters — has her doubts.

“She was unable to provide an estimated date, but our deduction is that there will be no future time where Ms. Rivera feels telework will again be appropriate for staff if the determining factor is whether a backlog of work exists,” Blunt said.

Rivera did not offer a firm timeline in exchanges with The Press Democrat.

“We cannot have programs without stable infrastructure and funding,” she said. “There are times when temporary measures are necessary to address issues of great concern. This is one of those times.”

You can reach Phil Barber at 707-521-5263 or phil.barber@pressdemocrat.com. On Twitter @Skinny_Post.



Source link

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
Previous post Falcons QB Feleipe Franks Explains Training at Tight End
Next post Alaska High Court Reverses Ruling That Roiled House Election | Political News